In the camp of Yahweh. (Part II)

Transition to the time of Christ. What mention was made of the tabernacle of testimony and Israel's wandering in the wilderness? If the wilderness narrative was simply a theological portrait, then surely this should be clear in the writings of the New Testament authors. Where the Pharisees and scribes had been blind, the New Testament authors expounded under Divine inspiration.

"Before the Throne of God" by Glad

New Testament References to the Tabernacle:

• Mark 2:23-26, "And it happened that He was passing through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and His disciples began to make their way along while picking the heads of grain. The Pharisees were saying to Him, 'Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?' And He said to them, 'Have you never read what David did when he was in need and he and his companions became hungry; how he entered the house of God in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the consecrated bread, which is not lawful for anyone to eat except the priests, and he also gave it to those who were with him?'"
• Tabernacle of Testimony - portrayed as a historical tent of worship
• How were the Pharisees so confident that the disciples were doing that which was "not lawful on the Sabbath" if the Sabbath law(s) were mentioned alongside an imaginary tent of testimony (i.e. the tabernacle) in the Pentateuch?
• Why would Jesus, the Son of God, recognize a pretend legal system which gave instruction on an imaginary tent of testimony?
• According to Jesus, King David entered a real place called the "house of God". What physical house of God (recognized by God Himself) was there before the temple, other than the tent of testimony?
• How could a known ancestral high priest serve in an imaginary house of God?
• How could bread be consecrated bread outside of being prepared for service in a real Tent of Testimony or Temple?
• Why would God ordain a mere tent of testimony, rather than a more enduring structure, if the nation of Israel never migrated?
• Acts 7:44-50, "'[Stephen speaking before the Jewish Council] Our fathers had the tabernacle of testimony in the wilderness, just as He who spoke to Moses directed him to make it according to the pattern which he had seen. And having received it in their turn, our fathers brought it in with Joshua upon dispossessing the nations whom God drove out before our fathers, until the time of David. David found favor in God’s sight, and asked that he might find a dwelling place for the God of Jacob. But it was Solomon who built a house for Him. However, the Most High does not dwell in houses made by human hands; as the prophet says:      
        "HEAVEN IS MY THRONE,
              AND EARTH IS THE FOOTSTOOL OF MY FEET;
              WHAT KIND OF HOUSE WILL YOU BUILD FOR ME?" says the Lord,
              "OR WHAT PLACE IS THERE FOR MY REPOSE?                                           
        WAS IT NOT MY HAND WHICH MADE ALL THESE THINGS?"'"
• Tabernacle of Testimony - portrayed as a historical tent of worship
• Stephen was on trial before the Jewish Council. Why would he offer the defense that real Jewish forefathers had worshiped God at an imaginary tabernacle of testimony? How would fiction justify him?
• How could an imaginary tent of testimony endure until the time of the real King Solomon?
• Why follow up a story about a merely imaginary house of God by stating that God "does not dwell in houses made by human hands"?
• Why would God ordain a mere tent of testimony, rather than a more enduring structure, if the nation of Israel never migrated?
• How could Stephen defend himself before the Jewish Council with an imaginative tale of Jewish forefathers wandering in the wilderness and dispossessing the nations of Canaan? Would the Jewish Council really consider this an irrefutable argument?
• Hebrews 8:1-5, "Now the main point in what has been said is this: we have such a high priest, who has taken His seat at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens, a minister in the sanctuary and in the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, not man. For every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices; so it is necessary that this high priest also have something to offer. Now if He were on earth, He would not be a priest at all, since there are those who offer the gifts according to the Law; who serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things, just as Moses was warned by God when he was about to erect the tabernacle; for, 'SEE,' He says, 'THAT YOU MAKE all things ACCORDING TO THE PATTERN WHICH WAS SHOWN YOU ON THE MOUNTAIN.'"
• Tabernacle of Testimony - portrayed as a historical tent of worship
• Why would the author of Hebrews write that the "true tabernacle" was pitched by the Lord and not man? If the tabernacle of testimony was immaterial, how can you contrast it with an immaterial true tabernacle?
• How could earthly high priests serve a "copy and shadow of the heavenly things" if they were serving in an immaterial tabernacle of testimony?
• How could a real ancestor Moses erect an immaterial tabernacle?
• Why would God provide a pattern for the crafting of an immaterial tabernacle?
• Why would God strictly command Moses about the crafting of that which was not meant to be crafted?
• Why would God ordain a mere tent of testimony, rather than a more enduring structure, if the nation of Israel never migrated?
• Hebrews 9:1-12, "Now even the first covenant had regulations of divine worship and the earthly sanctuary. For there was a tabernacle prepared, the outer one, in which were the lampstand and the table and the sacred bread; this is called the holy place. Behind the second veil there was a tabernacle which is called the Holy of Holies, having a golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant covered on all sides with gold, in which was a golden jar holding the manna, and Aaron’s rod which budded, and the tables of the covenant; and above it were the cherubim of glory overshadowing the mercy seat; but of these things we cannot now speak in detail.      
        . . . the priests are continually entering the outer tabernacle performing the divine worship, but into the second, only the high priest enters once a year, not without taking blood, which he offers for himself and for the sins of the people committed in ignorance . . .
        But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things to come, He entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this creation; and not through the blood of goats and calves, but through His own blood . . ."
• Tabernacle of Testimony - portrayed as a historical tent of worship
• If the "first covenant" ordained an immaterial tabernacle, how could that tabernacle be an "earthly sanctuary"?
• Why say that "we cannot now speak in detail" of the character of the earthly tabernacle if it was merely imaginative?
• How could a merely imaginary tabernacle be holy?
• How could the high priests offer sacrificial blood in an imaginary taberacle?
• Why write that Christ entered a "more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands" if the earthly tabernacle was also immaterial?
• Why write that the ark, manna, "Aaron's rod which budded", and the stone tablets were kept in the tabernacle if the story of Israel wandering in the wilderness was imaginary?
• Why would God ordain a mere tent of testimony, rather than a more enduring structure, if the nation of Israel never migrated?

Two brothers. One people. One God. (Part II)

On to the New Testament writings concerning Aaron and Moses. How were these two figures remembered by the modern (Roman era) Jews? Were Moses and Aaron merely characters useful for theological debate? Was their story of leading the Israelite people up from Egypt merely a parable?

Ok, this will again be difficult. I just scrolled through (on the Bible Hub website) the New Testament references to Moses, and I will definitely need to condense. If the following seems long, well, I still did condense.

"Whom Shall I Fear" by Chris Tomlin

New Testament references to Moses and Aaron:

• Mark 9:2-8, "Six days later, Jesus took with Him Peter and James and John, and brought them up on a high mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them; and His garments became radiant and exceedingly white, as no launderer on earth can whiten them. Elijah appeared to them along with Moses; and they were talking with Jesus. Peter said to Jesus, 'Rabbi, it is good for us to be here; let us make three tabernacles, one for You, and one for Moses, and one for Elijah.' For he did not know what to answer; for they became terrified. Then a cloud formed, overshadowing them, and a voice came out of the cloud, 'This is My beloved Son, listen to Him!' All at once they looked around and saw no one with them anymore, except Jesus alone."
• Moses - portrayed as a historical man.
• How could Jesus speak to imaginary men?
• Why would Jesus associate with imaginary characters before his disciples? How would that help His credibility?
• Why would Peter suggest building a real tabernacle/tent/dwelling for an imaginary Moses?
• Why would Peter, James, and John be terrified, at the same time, unless they really observed something extraordinary (i.e. the transfiguration of Christ and the appearance of ancestors)?
• Why would Peter identify an imaginary Moses?
• Luke 1:1-7, "Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us, just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word, it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order, most excellent Theophilus; so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught.
        In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah; and he had a wife from the daughters [descendents] of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. They were both righteous in the sight of God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and requirements of the Lord. But they had no child, because Elizabeth was barren, and they were both advanced in years."
• Aaron - portrayed as a historical man.
• Why would an eyewitness account of Christ begin with reference to descendents (Zacharias and Elizabeth) of an imaginary person Aaron?
• Why would the author profess to teach the "exact truth" and then reference an imaginary Aaron?
• Why retain the priesthood of Aaron from the conquest/settlement of Canaan through to Roman rule, if Aaron was an imaginary figure?
• Why bother with writing out an acount of Christ "in consecutive order" if you're starting with imaginary ancestry which has no place in human history?
• Why note details such as the priestly division of Abijah, when the whole priesthood had fictitious origins in an imaginary Aaron?
  
• John 5:39-47, "[Jesus speaking to the Jews seeking to kill Him] 'You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life. I do not receive glory from men; but I know you, that you do not have the love of God in yourselves. I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him. How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and you do not seek the glory that is from the one and only God? Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father; the one who accuses you is Moses, in whom you have set your hope. For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?'"
• Moses - portrayed as a historical man.
• How could an imaginary man Moses accuse the Jews seeking to kill Christ?
• Why would the Jews set their hope in an imaginary man?
• How could the Jews possibly "believe" the words/writings of an imaginary man? Yet, Jesus implied that they should.
• Why would Jesus inseverably tie belief in the testimony of an imaginary man Moses to belief in His own real testimony? Wouldn't this be self-defeating?
• Why would Jesus attribute "writings" to Moses, if Moses never lived?
• Acts 7:2-53, "And he said [Stephen speaking before the Jewish Council and the high priest], 'Hear me, brethren and fathers! The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran . . . But as the time of the promise was approaching which God had assured to Abraham, the people increased and multiplied in Egypt, until THERE AROSE ANOTHER KING OVER EGYPT WHO KNEW NOTHING ABOUT JOSEPH. It was he who took shrewd advantage of our race and mistreated our fathers so that they would expose their infants and they would not survive. It was at this time that Moses was born; and he was lovely in the sight of God, and he was nurtured three months in his father’s home. And after he had been set outside, Pharaoh’s daughter took him away and nurtured him as her own son. Moses was educated in all the learning of the Egyptians, and he was a man of power in words and deeds . . . MOSES FLED AND BECAME AN ALIEN IN THE LAND OF MIDIAN, where he became the father of two sons. After forty years had passed, AN ANGEL APPEARED TO HIM IN THE WILDERNESS OF MOUNT Sinai . . . THE LORD SAID TO HIM, "TAKE OFF THE SANDALS FROM YOUR FEET, FOR THE PLACE ON WHICH YOU ARE STANDING IS HOLY GROUND. I HAVE CERTAINLY SEEN THE OPPRESSION OF MY PEOPLE IN EGYPT AND HAVE HEARD THEIR GROANS, AND I HAVE COME DOWN TO RESCUE THEM; COME NOW, AND I WILL SEND YOU TO EGYPT." . . . This man led them out, performing wonders and signs in the land of Egypt and in the Red Sea and in the wilderness for forty years. This is the Moses who said to the sons of Israel, "GOD WILL RAISE UP FOR YOU A PROPHET LIKE ME FROM YOUR BRETHREN." [see also Acts 3:17-24] This is the one who was in the congregation in the wilderness together with the angel who was speaking to him on Mount Sinai, and who was with our fathers; and he received living oracles to pass on to you. Our fathers were unwilling to be obedient to him, but repudiated him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt, SAYING TO AARON, "MAKE FOR US GODS WHO WILL GO BEFORE US; FOR THIS MOSES WHO LED US OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT—WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO HIM." At that time they made a calf and brought a sacrifice to the idol . . . Our fathers had the tabernacle of testimony in the wilderness, just as He who spoke to Moses directed him to make it according to the pattern which he had seen . . . You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become; you who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it.'"
• Moses and Aaron - portrayed as historical men.
• Why would Stephen speak of the enslavement of real Jewish forefathers ("our fathers") and then describe their deliverance through an imaginary man Moses?
• How could the birth of an imaginary man Moses answer the "time of promise"?
• Why describe the details of Moses' birth and education, if Moses was merely an imaginary figure, when he wasn't doing anything to save Israel from bondage at that point?
• How could an imaginary man Moses be a "prophet"?
• Why would a real, coming Messiah be likened to an imaginary man? If deliverance through Moses was imaginary, would that not imply imaginary salvation through a coming Messiah?
• How could real Jewish forefathers ("Our fathers") speak to an imaginary Aaron?
• How could an imaginary Aaron lead Israel into real idolatry by fashioning idols?
• What meaning would there be for Stephen to say that his listeners were rebelling in the same manner as imaginary forefathers, such as Aaron?
• How could Israel receive the law and pattern for the tabernacle directly from God, if Moses wasn't there in person to receive God's instructions?
• Hebrews 7:11-14, "Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also. For the one concerning whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, a tribe with reference to which Moses spoke nothing concerning priests."
• Moses and Aaron - portrayed as historical men.
• How could you have the real "order of Aaron", if Aaron, the originator of that order, never lived?
• How could the Levitical priesthood be tied to the real law at the same time as it was tied to an imaginary Aaron?
• If the Jewish genealogies are historically accurate in describing how Jesus was descended from Judah, why would they be merely imaginative in saying that Aaron was descended from Judah's brother Levi?
• How could an imaginary Moses' be the religious authority regarding the real priesthood?
• Why would anyone refer to the speech/writings of an imaginary man Moses?
• Hebrews 11:22-40, "By faith Joseph, when he was dying, made mention of the exodus of the sons of Israel, and gave orders concerning his bones. By faith Moses, when he was born, was hidden for three months by his parents, because they saw he was a beautiful child; and they were not afraid of the king’s edict. By faith Moses, when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to endure ill-treatment with the people of God than to enjoy the passing pleasures of sin, considering the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt; for he was looking to the reward. By faith he left Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king; for he endured, as seeing Him who is unseen. By faith he kept the Passover and the sprinkling of the blood, so that he who destroyed the firstborn would not touch them. By faith they passed through the Red Sea as though they were passing through dry land; and the Egyptians, when they attempted it, were drowned . . . And all these, having gained approval through their faith, did not receive what was promised, because God had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect."
• Moses - portrayed as a historical man.
• How could an imaginary Moses exemplify faith?
• Why such detailed consistency on how Moses was hidden "three months" if the story about Moses is imaginative? Moses was a baby at that point and was doing nothing to save the Israelites.
• Why mention the real Egyptian Pharaohs and speak at the same time of an imaginary Moses?
• How could an imaginary Moses keep the first real Jewish Passover and motivate succeeding generations to do so also?
• How could an imaginary Moses "gain approval" through his faith?
• How could an imaginary Moses be linked to New Testament Christians ("apart from us they would not be made perfect")?

"Children of Abraham"?

"You Are I Am" by Mercy Me

Exodus 3:14-15, "God said to Moses, 'I AM WHO I AM'; and He said, 'Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, "I AM has sent me to you."' God, furthermore, said to Moses, 'Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, "The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you." This is My name forever, and this is My memorial-name to all generations.'"

Isaiah 48:12, "Listen to Me, O Jacob, even Israel whom I called;
            I am He, I am the first, I am also the last."

"Abraham"--in the New Testament there is another wealth of verses wherein this name appears. I cannot, right now, look at them all with the length they deserve. But let me see what I find. What came to mind when people in the New Testament wrote or spoke of Abraham?

• Matthew 1:1-17, "The record of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers . . . Eliud was the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob. Jacob was the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, by whom Jesus was born, who is called the Messiah. So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; from David to the deportation to Babylon, fourteen generations; and from the deportation to Babylon to the Messiah, fourteen generations."
• Abraham - portrayed as a historical man.
• Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob--the genealogical list remains identical in the New Testament.
• How could the Messiah, Jesus, be the descendant of Abraham, if Abraham was only figurative/imaginary/theological?
• Why would the historical deportation/exile of the Israelite people be noted in a merely figurative genealogy?
• Why would the generations be counted, if some of the individuals were simply figurative? Who would count a figurative generation?
• John 8:37-40, "'I know that you [Jews] are Abraham’s descendants; yet you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. I speak the things which I have seen with My Father; therefore you also do the things which you heard from your father.' They answered and said to Him, 'Abraham is our father.' Jesus said to them, 'If you are Abraham’s children, do the deeds of Abraham. But as it is, you are seeking to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God; this Abraham did not do.'"
• Abraham - portrayed as a historical man.
• Why would Jesus contradict Himself by saying that these Jews were figurative descendants of Abraham, but did not act as his children/descendants?
• Why would Jesus tell the Jews to "do the deeds" of an imaginary man, whom they might object was too idealized to imitate?
• How would the Jews feel rebuked by being called antagonists toward the truth in a manner that their merely figurative forefather never was?
• When you say someone doesn't follow in their parents' footsteps, you are talking about their real-life parents--in the Jews case, this was a well-remembered ancestor.
• John 8:52-59, "The Jews said to Him, 'Now we know that You have a demon. Abraham died, and the prophets also; and You say, "If anyone keeps My word, he will never taste of death." Surely You are not greater than our father Abraham, who died? The prophets died too; whom do You make Yourself out to be?' Jesus answered, 'If I glorify Myself, My glory is nothing; it is My Father who glorifies Me, of whom you say, "He is our God"; and you have not come to know Him, but I know Him; and if I say that I do not know Him, I will be a liar like you, but I do know Him and keep His word. Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.' So the Jews said to Him, 'You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?' Jesus said to them, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am.' Therefore they picked up stones to throw at Him, but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple."
• Abraham - portrayed as a historical man.
• The Jews believed Abraham died/tasted death. How could a merely figurative man die?
• Why would the Jews respect the name of Abraham if they believed the stories about him were made up?
• How could a figurative man rejoice to foresee the real coming of Christ?
• Why would the Jews point out Jesus' apparently young age in arguing that he couldn't have lived during the time of a figurative Abraham?
• How could a figurative person be born?
• Why would Jesus claim to be in existence before a figurative ancestor?
• Acts 7:2-8, "And he [Stephen, defending himself before the Jewish Council] said, 'Hear me, brethren and fathers! The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran, and said to him, "LEAVE YOUR COUNTRY AND YOUR RELATIVES, AND COME INTO THE LAND THAT I WILL SHOW YOU." Then he left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in Haran. From there, after his father died, God had him move to this country in which you are now living. But He gave him no inheritance in it, not even a foot of ground, and yet, even when he had no child, He promised that HE WOULD GIVE IT TO HIM AS A POSSESSION, AND TO HIS DESCENDANTS AFTER HIM. But God spoke to this effect, that his DESCENDANTS WOULD BE ALIENS IN A FOREIGN LAND, AND THAT THEY WOULD BE ENSLAVED AND MISTREATED FOR FOUR HUNDRED YEARS. "AND WHATEVER NATION TO WHICH THEY WILL BE IN BONDAGE I MYSELF WILL JUDGE," said God, "AND AFTER THAT THEY WILL COME OUT AND SERVE ME IN THIS PLACE." And He gave him the covenant of circumcision; and so Abraham became the father of Isaac, and circumcised him on the eighth day; and Isaac became the father of Jacob, and Jacob of the twelve patriarchs.'"
• Abraham - portrayed as a historical man.
• Why would Stephen say that the real God appeared to a figurative man living in a real land?
• How could a figurative man move to the real land in which the Jews of Stephen's day were living?
• Why would Stephen take note of promises to a figurative ancestor--as if these promises were somehow translated into reality and passed onto the people of Israel?
• Why would Stephen and the Jewish people revere the God of a figurative ancestor?
• Romans 9:3-8, "For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren . . . who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons . . . and the promises, whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen. But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: 'THROUGH ISAAC YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL BE NAMED.' That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants."
• Abraham - portrayed as a historical man.
• Why would Abraham's descendants be called "children of the flesh"/natural birth if Abraham was merely figurative?
• Why would one say that the descendants of a figurative Abraham were not really all figurative children of Abraham? How can you contrast figurative with figurative?
• What meaning is there in saying that the children of God are children of a figurative promise (i.e. a promise to a figurative Abraham about his descendants being named through Isaac)?